Karunalaya Social Service Society
 

 

Report of Consultative Meeting of 04-01-2005 for the Relief and Restoration of Normal life to the Victims of Tsunami Tide.


Participants:

1. Mr. S. John Bosco – President
2. Mr. B. Ravi Kumar David – Vice President
3. Mr. N. Paul Sunder Singh- Director Karunalaya
4. Mr. V. Arun – Member
5. Dr. Elizabeth Negi – Development Consultant
6. Mr. Senthilathiban – Development consultant
7. Dr. Pavithra – Lecturer and Activists
8. Ms. Poornima Arun – Teacher and Activists
9. Ms. Mijke van Gijn, - Dutch Volunteer
10. Ms. Loes Wevers, - Dutch Volunteer
11. Mr. Gijsbert van Holland – Dutch Volunteer
12. Ms. Pien Reyers- Dutch Volunteer

 

1. One minute silence for the repose of the souls of those who are affected by the Tsunami Tide on 26.12.2004

2. Introduction
The President of Karunalaya Mr. John Bosco presided over the meeting, Mr. Ravi Kumar David, Vice President of Karunalaya chaired the meeting. The Director of Karunalaya Mr. Paul Sunder Singh introduced the members present for the meeting and how they are associated with Karunalaya. He also explained in detail what has been done so far since 26 December 2004 Karunalaya has been working for the protection and development of children and women in the fishing communities of North Chennai since 1995. On the 26th December 2004 the unexpected Tsunami tide washed away many lives, property houses and rendered thousands of families homeless. Karunalaya also lost 3 nonformal education centres at Anna Nagar, Pallavan Nagar, and Powerkuppam Pallam areas.

1. Immediately after the disaster, Karunalaya set up a kitchen in the premises of Karunalaya and provided cooked food for the people in the above areas continuously. About 650 kgs of rice cooked each day.
2. A quick assessment of the damage situation by the staff team was done on the 27th December 2004
3. Collection of old clothes for distribution to the people is being done
4. We have also dispatched about 22 boxes of clothes to Nagapattinam district where more loss of life and damage has occurred
5. Mr. Paul Sunder Singh attended a meeting called by the Collector of Chennai and the District Social Welfare Officer on 29.12.2004 at 11.am and appraised of the relief work and the disparity in providing government relief to victims, and the discontent in the service delivery of government machinery - ground realities.
6. Coordinating with other active NGOs in motivating many people to support the relief work.

The primary level of relief was completely undertaken. Many volunteers and philanthropists came forward to support our initiatives knowing that we are working on relief efforts. Involved many volunteers in the relief operation some such volunteers are worth mentioning;

1. Ms. Mijke
2. Ms. Loes
3. Ms. Elena
4. Dr. Elizabeth Negi
5. Mr. Senthilathiban and team (Sparks Development Group)
6. Mr. Shanmugam and team (BSAC)
7. Dr. Pavithra
8. Dr. Sailakshmi
9. Mr. Henry and Ms. Shailaja (Genuine Computers)
10. And the whole staff team of KARUNALAYA involved in the relief operation
11. Children in the shelter home of Karunalaya are involved in the relief operation

Some of the philanthropists who extended immediate support for relief work

1. Dr. Elizabeth Negi – Rs. 5000/-
2. Fr. Josh – 2 bags of rice
3. Fr. Gerard – 5 bags of rice
4. Dr. Sai Lakshmi – Rs. 1000/-
5. Dr. Pavithra – Rs. 275/- and clothes
6. Mr. Badhri – Rs. 5000/-
7. Dr. Dilip Metha Hospital Pvt Ltd – 800 food packets
8. Mr. Andreez – 1 rice bag
9. Virtual Text – Rs. 2500
10. Mr. Ravi, Rathna Traders – Rs. 500
11. Office Tigers – Rs. 3000
12. Mr. Henry and Ms. Shailaja, Genuine Computers – Rs. 600 + 6 bags of rice
13. Wheels India Ltd, Padi – 300 Kg rice + Dhall+Oil+ spices etc..
14. Rotary club through Siga Animation Centre – 20 boxes of clothes
15. Ms. Mijke, Ms. Loes, Mr. Elena – 500 Kg rice, 200 Kg, Dhall, 100 kg oil, packing covers, knifes, vegetables, and continuous support
16. Guild of Service, Egmore 250 litres of milk

3. Purpose of the meeting.
During the relief operations Karunalaya appealed to many people to extend a helping hand. Responding to our requests one of our Funding Partners CORDAID in the Netherlands expressed postive reply to support our relief efforts and approved one crore rupees in Indian currency, (196,000 euro) for relief and to restore "normal life" of the Tsunami victims. Therefore it was highly important to discuss how to implement the "Tsunami Relief and Restoration Project" in a responsible and effective way hence the emergency meeting of the board with volunteers and development consultants was held on the 4th January 2005. The goal was to find solutions and answers to problems, what leads us towards a reliable and efficient plan.

The Relief Plan
One of the members present gave a short outline of the levels of relief operations which was refined and presented below

The Primary stage of relief work was immediate

  • Rescue of people
  • Sustained Food and water supply
  • Shelter, distributing collected cloth
  • Medical aid

The Secondary stage of relief work, was

  • Identification and reporting loss of life
  • Number of missing people, people hospitalised
  • The damage to houses and households materials
  • Economic losses (Loss of livelihood)
  • Then the next phase of the second stage is
    Restore Normal Life to the people (In short period of time) by

    • Re building houses (Temporary)
    • Help restore household materials
    • Restart livelihood
    • Provide psychological support
    • Restore schooling and education of children

     

    The Tertiary Stage of the relief work is the long-term rehabilitation

    • Prevention of Disaster
    • Protection Mechanism
    • Awareness, Education and Training on Disaster Management
    • Disaster Preparedness
    • Rehabilitation of Victims (Permanent houses, institutional care, etc)
    • Follow up and support

4. How shall we go about the implementation of the projects?

4a. What are the concerns in the implementation of the project.

  • The areas are part of the CRZ- The Coastal regulation zones. Building permanent houses is not possible.
  • The temporary houses are not fire proof. So the people are very afraid for fire
  • The fisherman families are very attached to Kasimedu areas. While people with other professions would like to move. How do we deal with both groups?
  • Do we need to support the other areas as well?
  • Do not create dependency of the people on us
  • Find out the Fishermen and non Fishermen families in each area
  • How can we avoid the support taken away by the mafia?
  • How can we make sure that all the support will go to the victims?
  • Can we offer the victims protection?
  • The fishers that work with trawlers might need longer support, because it will take some more time to restore the boats.
  • Other people might take photos, and collect money without supplying it to the victims.

4b. What measures to be taken in the course of action.

  • Karunalaya should be coordinating all the support in the areas. If other organisations want to do relief work, they first have to discuss with Karunalaya, to avoid personal profits.
  • Karunalaya has to be sure that the people are well protected.
  • Karunalaya has to cooperate intensely with "self-help groups " of the fisherman’s communities.
  • Karunalaya including with the help of the self-help groups should document precisely who the victims are and what kind of relief they need.
  • Karunalaya should have frequent meetings with the self-help groups, and it is very important to document what is discussed.
  • And, very important Karunalaya has to make a good developed plan, so that the organisations, who gave financial support will be convinced that the support is well used
  • The safety of the volunteers and the staff members should be guaranteed at all time.
  • The staff of Karunalaya should be trained to give psychological support.

4c. Who all need to be involved at the moment and later in the next phase

  • Input from developing aid experts.
  • Self-help groups from the fisher areas.
  • Relief support of volunteers.
  • Staff of Karunalaya.
  • Government for land and protection.
  • All people and organisations that like to give support without any profit.

5. What changes should be made in the proposed activities

  • It is now time to restore "normal life" of the victims, so to rehabilitate the community.
  • To involve the fisherman communities, the self-help groups.
  • To restore life hoods, with the input and responsibility of the fisherman’s society.
  • To involve aid developing experts.
  • The temporary housing need to be looked into if we can do it fire proof

6. Reporting- monitoring mechanism
Due to monitoring and reporting you can reduce the chance of miscommunication. So it is important to document and report all the meetings.

  • It is very important to monitor and report all the meetings with the self-help groups of the fisher areas.
  • Involve the people to monitor the activities for effective implementation and to have shared responsibility
  • It is very important to monitor end report all the meetings with the staff of Karunalaya.
  • It is very important to monitor and report any meeting with external experts.

7. Participatory process.

  • There should be a detailed list of action what includes the involved participates.
  • Let the planning be a participatory process so the people need and priorities comes out in the plan
  • The victims should be well informed about the process of action.
  • All participants should well inform Karunalaya about their activities.

8. What should be our policy level changes to take the issue?

  • The organisational policy shall be amended by including the disaster management activities as an area of priority of Karunalaya and take holistic rehabilitation of the people including construction of housing, livelihood restoration, relief measures and training on disaster preparedness to the community people etc.

  • There should be one overall detailed plan of action.
  • Every participant should well know their role in action and should take their responsibility very seriously.
  • Every day there should be a meeting to evaluate the progress what contains the progress of advance as well as the problems and solutions.
  • The entire meetings should be well documented.

9. Any other matter to be considered
Since there was no other matter to discuss, the chairman summed up the lively discussion and said that the decisions will be implemented systematically and shall meet after some progress is made in the present project.

10. Votes of thanks
Mr. Paul kindly thanked all the people for their valuable input and time.